Rural Voters See Little Difference between Political Parties

The rural vote is up for grabs. That is good for rural people because it sends a message to both parties that they can neither write us off nor take us for granted. 

  A Center for Rural Strategies poll of rural voters in 13 key swing states illustrates a critical rural battleground in the fall election. No one is predicting that the Republican presidential candidate will lose the rural vote. The question is the margin, and it’s critical to the outcome of the national election.

Republicans may take heart in learning that most rural voters believe Barack Obama does not share their values. But they can take no comfort in rural voters giving Democrats an eight point advantage on managing the economy and most agreeing that “John McCain served his country honorably, but does not seem to understand my economic problems.”

Democrats complain that rural voters ignore their own economic interests in voting for Republicans. While rural voters give an edge to Democrats in managing the economy overall, the party has not persuaded voters that it will do a better job of dealing with the economic issues closest to home – rural issues. A little over one-third favor Barack Obama on that score and the same proportion John McCain.

It’s no wonder that rural voters see little difference. Both parties produce farm bills that subsidize mega farms to drive family farms out of business, as they fail to invest in entrepreneurial strategies to create genuine opportunity for rural people and a future for their communities. Both parties produce tax bills that lavish tax breaks on corporate America and mega farms, rather than helping ordinary rural people buy homes and start farms and small businesses.

Neither party has demonstrated real commitment to ensuring that rural people – who contribute so much to the nation’s prosperity – share in it. Neither party seems to understand that America will never be as strong as it can be until all of America has the opportunity to share in building wealth, assets, and prosperity.

If Republicans would go to bat on rural economic issues, they could persuade rural voters that they understand the challenges they face. And if the Democrats would go to bat for ordinary rural people on those issues, they might finally give rural Americans a reason to vote economic issues.

But to date in this election and every election for the last generation, neither party has demonstrated that it will fight for ordinary rural people. The party that finally does can capture the rural margin it needs to win this election and many elections to come.

Agree or disagree? Send your comments and questions to Chuck Hassebrook, chuckh@cfra.org or 402.687.2103 x 1018.

Politics

Unless they are rural voters making more than $270,000 a year they will clearly benefit from an Obama presidency. The most wealthy will finally contribute their portion to our tax base for the first time in 8 years. And their sons will not have to die in wars we should not be in. Both of these policies will help rural voters and our economy.

I also feel confident that Barack Obama is smart enough and open minded enough to understand how important it is to save small farms and stop giving incentives to Agribusiness. He is not in the pocket of big business as are most Republicans.

There is a world of difference and I hope for all our sakes people get educated and understand this.

Politics

You say that farmers earning less that $270,000 will benefit from an Obama Presidency, but I just don't see how? Didn't Congress just pass a 5 year farm bill that we all hate? I doubt that Obama will be able to convince even a Domocratic majority of Congress to revisit this issue, seeing as how they already provided the "sunset" provisions that force us to revisit this issue every 5 years anyway. Neither party has advanced much support for family farmers and ranchers, and both parties show damn little interest in the will of the people on most other issues (America's Citizens shouted down the egregious McCain/Kennedy Comprehensive Immigration Reform/Amnesty, yet both Candidates are champing at the bit to force this down our throats ASAP).

I hope you are right Kathy.

I hope you are right Kathy. It is true about democrats that the House democrats scuttled the Title 10 provisions of the Senate over the abuses of corporate agribusiness over farmers. House committee chair Peterson held the conference bill up until large agribusiness could grease the political wheels for themselves. Obama will have to contend with these sell out politicians who are no better than sell out republicans. I for one will be watching to see if he will.

Sell outs like Peterson should never be rewarded by the party with a chairmanship position, whether in the Democratic or Republican party but that would mean that government policy wasn't for sale. Right now we have the best government money can buy and both the democrat and republican party leaders are doing the selling to the detriment of our great country.

 

It was really funny watching democrats and republican leaders who got their way selling out good public policy to big money. They were up there doing their happy dance on the farm bill so happy that they got away with it (for the time being). In my opinion, these people should not be given government power. No wonder Congress has such low respect in our country. It is full of politicians instead of statesmen.

 

 

Tom

Obama not a sell-out?

Hmmm, what about his having voted IN FAVOR OF immunity for telecoms which assisted Bush in warrantless wiretapping?  How is that not a sell-out?

I hope Ron Paul is still running.

If that happened, it was a

If that happened, it was a total sell out.  We are entering a phase in our country where we are no longer a nation of laws, but a nation of corporations who buy the laws or their enforcement and politicians and judges who retroactively "fix" things for big corporations, but not the rights of the weakest in our country.  The "beacon on the hill" is becoming fogged.

 

Tom 

 

 

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Answer this question to show you are human and help us prevent spam.
2 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.