Welcome back to the Pierre Review!
South Dakota’s Legislative Session has nearly reached its conclusion. Thursday was day 36 (out of 37) of the session and Monday was the deadline for all bills or joint resolutions to pass both houses. March 30 is considered the 37th and last day of the session and is reserved for gubernatorial vetoes.
Senate Bill 157 (brought at request of the governor) Oppose → revises certain provisions regarding the county zoning and appeals process.
SB 157 removes the requirement for a public hearing for special permits at the county level and limits the ability of the public to participate in the permitting process for concentrated animal feeding operations, wind energy developments, and other infrastructure and agricultural projects that would be built in their area. The Center opposes this legislation as it limits local control. We believe citizens should have the opportunity to weigh in on projects to be built in their area and express concerns or bring up important issues that should be addressed.
The Center submitted comments in opposition to the bill. The bill passed the Senate on Feb. 21 on a 24-11 vote and was heard on the House floor March 9. Rep. Weise introduced an amendment changing the approval of a conditional use permit from requiring merely a majority of members of the approving authority who are present and voting, to “a majority of members of the approving authority.” This amendment addressed concerns that approvals could be affected by only a few county commissioners and passed on a 41-26 vote. The amended bill then passed the house with a vote of 45-22. The Senate concurred with the amendment on March 11 and the bill now heads to the governor’s desk.
House Bill 1271 (Karr) Support→ to establish certain provisions regarding the rural broadband fund.
HB 1271 was heard Feb. 26 in the House Commerce and Energy Committee. During the hearing, the bill sponsor, Representative Karr, explained the intent of this bill was to provide parameters and accountability for the management of the broadband development program, Connect South Dakota. Connect South Dakota is currently operated under the Governor’s Office of Economic Development. He requested that all partners work on this bill during the summer and bring it again next year.
The bill was tabled with a vote of 12-0.
SB 111 (Wiik) Support → excludes certain wind energy tax revenue from the state aid to education formula.
SB 111 changes the formula used to determine wind energy tax revenue for school districts in counties where wind energy projects are hosted. The bill would cap the amount of revenue from wind energy that would be considered as a county’s local effort for the purposes of determining state aid for education.
Passed 5-2 in the Senate Taxation Committee on Feb. 10, but failed to pass the Senate floor with a vote of 12-22.
SB 85 (Rusch) Neutral → establish an annual fee for certain electric motor vehicles and electric hybrid motor vehicles.
SB 85 creates an annual fee of $100 for electric motor vehicles and $50 for electric hybrid vehicles. The purpose of this bill is to offset the lost funds that are normally generated by the gas tax and collected in the state’s highway maintenance fund.
The Senate Transportation Committee had a hearing on this bill on Feb. 7 and was sent to the 41st day (killed) on a 5-2 vote.
SB 165 (Steinhauer) Support → require all wind energy facilities to include an aircraft detection lighting system.
Last year, the legislature passed a law requiring all wind energy facilities to include an aircraft detection lighting system. SB 165 would amend this law to allow—until 2024—for wind energy facilities permitted before July 2, 2019 to comply with the requirement.
This bill was heard in Senate Commerce and Energy on Feb. 20 and sent to the 41st day (killed) on a 6-1 vote.
HB 1125 (York) Support → revise conditions for selling non-temperature-controlled baked goods without license.
HB 1125 amends South Dakota’s “Home Processed Foods Law,” which allows for the sale of non-temperature controlled baked goods without a license. The bill makes several changes. The most beneficial would be the removal of the $5,000 gross sales cap. The bill also allows sellers to apply for an ID number for their product label instead of listing their personal information. The bill has been referred to the House Commerce and Energy Committee.
This bill sailed through both the House and Senate unopposed and is headed to the governor’s desk.
HB1008 (Qualm) Support → legalizes the growth and production of industrial hemp and derivative products in the state, and to declare an emergency.
After passing the House floor Feb. 12 on a 54-12 vote, HB 1008 headed to the Senate floor on March 9. The Senate bill passed 25-9, but with a hoghoused version (hoghouse is a term used to describe the practice of stripping and replacing a bill’s language) that replaced the 20-plus page bill with only a single sentence: “The State of South Dakota will implement a plan for hemp in South Dakota.” This move was made in an attempt to further negotiations on the bill, particularly in regard to the program’s funding. The bill then went back to conference committees. On March 12, the last day for any bill movement, the conference committees conferred on a new, full version of the bill that included the funding requested by the governor. HB 1008 includes an emergency clause that, if the Governor signs the bill, will allow the new law to take immediate effect. Gov. Noem has indicated she plans to sign the bill. This U.S. News story covers the bill’s final progress.
HB 1006 (Chaffee) Support → authorizes the secretary of revenue to contract with certain entities for the purpose of maintaining a database to determine agricultural income value and to specify the mandatory and permissive data of the database.
HB 1006 has been brought at the request of Agricultural Land Assessment Implementation and Oversight Advisory Task Force. The purpose of the bill is to allow the state to utilize a wide range of agencies to gather information on different types of agriculture with the intent to build a broader database and increase data accuracy, especially in regard to non-cropland. Proponents of the bill include the Dept. of Revenue, SD Stockgrowers Association, Farm Bureau, SD Cattlemen's Association, and SD Chamber of Commerce.
HB 1006 passed both houses with little to no opposition and was signed by the governor on Feb. 19.
HB 1007 (Chaffee) Support → requires certain adjustments to the assessed value of agricultural land, if factors impact the land's productivity and require those adjustments to be documented.
HB 1007 has been brought at the request of the Agricultural Land Assessment Implementation and Oversight Advisory Task Force. The purpose of the bill is to create a uniform process for land owners to request a piece of land be reassessed to reflect actual productivity. It also requires the assessors to document the request, investigation, findings, and reasoning for their decision. Proponents of the bill include SD Stockgrowers Association, SD Conservation Districts, Farm Bureau, SD Association of Cooperatives, and SD Cattlemen's Association.
The bill passed both the House and Senate with no opposition and was signed by the governor on Feb. 27.
SB 76 (Russell) Support → to provide for the assessment of certain agricultural land as noncropland.
SB 76 allows for any agricultural land which has been seeded to grass for at least 10 years and is used for animal grazing or left unharvested or is native grassland, to be categorized as non cropland for assessment purposes.
SB 76 was heard in the Senate Taxation Committee on Feb. 12 and was sent to the 41st day (killed) on a 4-3 vote.
We welcome your input. Feel free to be in touch about these bills or other issues you feel are important to rural communities.
- Posted on 1.6.2020
- Posted on 1.27.2020
- Posted on 2.26.2020
- Posted on 3.6.2020
- Posted on 6.2.2020